Motley Crue Or Guns N' Roses

I usually have this debate with my cousin like once a week so i thought id bring it here. Now dont get under the distiction that im not a Motley crue fan cause i am but they are nothing to Guns N Roses. You never here some of Motleys main songs on the radio yet you here Guns N Roses tracks. GNR have way more familiar songs as well like "Sweet child o mine", "Welcoem to the jungle" and "November Rain". While Crue have "Kickstart My heart", "Girls Girls Girls" and "Dr feel Good". Now there good songs but which band's songs are you more familiar with?

So the question i ask if GNR or motley crue, Who is better?

ok....Motley are my fav band of all time, why?, They have a great bassit in Nikki Sixx this guy has lived a crazey life and has great stage persona and is just a real cool charecter...The drummer tommy lee has great stage persona and can work a crowd wonderfully and is a great drummer....mick is a great guitarest in that he makes up really stron riffs and the band is only a one guitarest band live and in the studio but mick is two old and suffers from a crondic spine desease. vince neil is a ok singer not mi fav but he does the job...motley gets the chicks as well....Guns n roses are my second fav band of all time.....axl rose is one of the greatest singers and can really belt out a song but his king of the dicks and nva seen a guy as stubborn as him....slash was a great guitarest for them..duff was a great bassits and the likes of steven alder and izzy stradlin aldo added depth....new guns and roses equal shittt......but guns n roses are much more popular and mainstream but now they are shit thanks to axl thats y im in favour of motley crue....lives foreva

ok....Motley are my fav band of all time, why?, They have a great bassit in Nikki Sixx this guy has lived a crazey life and has great stage persona and is just a real cool charecter...The drummer tommy lee has great stage persona and can work a crowd wonderfully and is a great drummer....mick is a great guitarest in that he makes up really stron riffs and the band is only a one guitarest band live and in the studio but mick is two old and suffers from a crondic spine desease. vince neil is a ok singer not mi fav but he does the job...motley gets the chicks as well....Guns n roses are my second fav band of all time.....axl rose is one of the greatest singers and can really belt out a song but his king of the dicks and nva seen a guy as stubborn as him....slash was a great guitarest for them..duff was a great bassits and the likes of steven alder and izzy stradlin aldo added depth....new guns and roses equal shittt......but guns n roses are much more popular and mainstream but now they are shit thanks to axl thats y im in favour of motley crue....lives foreva

GUNS N ROSES ARE SO MUCH BETTER THE ONLY GOOD SONG MOTLY CRUE HAS IS GIRLS AND ALL OF GUNS AND ROSES SONG ARE GREAT

dude watch the caps lock ay! and i suggest you check out "Shout at the devil" by motley

Guns N' Roses definitely. There's no denying that Motley Crue are great, but GNR are one of the best bands ever.

GNR. Motley Crue can't seem to make a solid album all the way through IMO. Seems like there's always some really weak tracks while GNR can make complete albums with good songs throughout.

DeathDivine wrote:GNR. Motley Crue can't seem to make a solid album all the way through IMO. Seems like there's always some really weak tracks while GNR can make complete albums with good songs throughout.

That sums it up for me. I'm not a fan of that genre of music but Guns 'N' Roses were talented and really stood out. I like a fair few of their tracks whereas the Crue seem weak when you look deeper than the major hits.

Guns N Roses.... I've never really been into bands like Motley Crue or Poison... they're more like hair metal to me. I'm not saying Motley Crue doesn't have talent, I'm sure they do but I've just always liked GNR better. Duff is the man!